Beyond the Game

Why what you build off the field matters as much as what you do on it

𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞

Athletes are founders — especially when the dream involves capital, content, branding, and reinvention. But the difference between those who get funded and those who don't often comes down to how they think about the opportunity.

I recently evaluated two competitors pursuing ambitious careers. Both had grit, competitive drive, and real talent.

The difference wasn't potential — it was mindset. One understood that performance is just one piece of building something larger. The other focused purely on competition without the surrounding infrastructure that makes investment viable.

This contrast shows why evaluating talent in sports means looking at the full picture, not just what happens on the field.

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬

Founder A

Founder B

📅 Age: Early 30s

📅 Age: Early 20s

📍 Geography: South

📍 Geography: West Coast

📈 Stage: Competing with goal of reaching professional tour

📊 Stage: Early competitive racing career with training plan

Industry: Amateur golf

🏎️ Industry: Motorsports

🎓 Background: College-level golf, started and ran a business post-college

🎓 Background: Multi-sport athlete with growing racing record

🔥 X-Factor: Rare hybrid of entrepreneurial and athletic ambition with clear alternative pathways

💡 X-Factor: Multi-sport talent with strong competitive drive

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐀: 𝐘𝐞𝐬 

This founder is pursuing a professional golf career after building and running a business post-college. The athletic background isn't just about skill—it's about the mentality to compete and win at the highest level.

What attracted me was the entrepreneurial willingness paired with athletic ambition. This founder had already proven the ability to build something from scratch. That operational thinking translates directly to how they approach the golf career: structured training, strategic planning, and clear milestone tracking.

The golf path alone would be a tough bet. But the alternative routes made this compelling. If the professional golf track doesn't yield major success, there's a clear pathway to building another venture with long-term value. The business experience provides optionality most athletes never develop.

Multiple paths to success with proven execution ability made this an easy yes.

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐁: 𝐍𝐨   

This founder is a multi-sport talent pursuing a professional racing career with a detailed training and competition plan. The ability is real, and the competitive drive is clear. Racing abroad and within the U.S. shows commitment to the path.

What attracted me initially was pure grit. I'm open to talent from any background, and the dedication to motorsports showed real hunger. The work ethic and competitive fire weren't in question.

However, the economics of motorsport create a fundamental mismatch. The capital required to compete at the highest levels — equipment, team support, travel, entry fees — far exceeds what our check size could meaningfully impact. Racing at scale demands six or seven-figure annual budgets.

Without the ability to move the needle on what matters most, there was no clear path to outsized returns. Our capital couldn't create the leverage needed to change trajectory.

The talent was there, but the financial structure of the sport made our involvement unlikely to generate meaningful outcomes — and this is why I said no.

𝐌𝐲 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐤

𝐀 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐤𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧

This comparison shows how entrepreneurial thinking and multiple revenue paths outweigh pure athletic talent

𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐫

𝐐: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬?

I look for people who understand they're building businesses, not just pursuing performance. Talent is baseline — but content strategy, media presence, business optionality, and revenue diversification separate fundable opportunities from purely talented competitors.

Consistent content creation, audience building, and testing business ideas while training — that shows founder mentality. Compare that to someone solely focused on performance metrics. One is building an ecosystem, the other is running a single-path gamble.

When the competitive dream doesn't materialize, what's left to build? Those with entrepreneurial thinking and proven execution have answers. Those focused purely on sport face a binary outcome — and that's where optionality becomes the difference between a bet and a gamble.

𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤

Did you enjoy this issue?

Your feedback will be used to refine this newsletter.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬

Talent alone doesn't justify investment. The people worth backing understand that performance is just one part of building something larger—a brand, a business, a platform that compounds over time.

The ledger entry is clear: bet on athletes who treat their career as a business, not just a competition.

Auditing more talent next week,
Will Stringer

P.S. If you found value in this entry, add it to someone else's ledger by forwarding this email. If you're that someone, subscribe here to get inside access to how I invest in exceptional people.