The Technical Edge

𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞

Two technical visions. Only one had the experience to execute.

Technical capability means different things across industries – and getting this assessment wrong can be costly.

This week, I'm examining two founders tackling complex physical products where technical execution determines everything. One brought deep domain expertise to navigate regulatory hurdles and engineering challenges. The other had an ambitious vision but lacked the specialized knowledge to validate feasibility.

Their contrast reveals why technical assessment must be calibrated to industry complexity – and why network validation becomes critical when evaluating capabilities beyond your expertise.

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐀: 𝐘𝐞𝐬 ✅

This founder's surgical assistance technology sits at the intersection of AI and medical devices - a large opportunity as artificial intelligence enters healthcare applications.

What mattered was the founder's specialized background in medical device development. They brought hands-on experience with the regulatory complexity, testing requirements, and commercialization challenges that trip up most medical device startups.

Their technical capability wasn't just general engineering skills - it was domain-specific expertise in bringing medical devices to market. They'd already achieved significant milestones in feasibility testing and regulatory preparation that demonstrate real progress.

The medical device industry has unique pitfalls that experienced founders can avoid. When regulatory timelines are measured in years, not months, speed of iteration and testing becomes a competitive edge.

When you combine market opportunity with proven capability to execute in a complex regulatory environment, the path to success becomes clear - this is why I said yes.

𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐁: 𝐍𝐨 ❌  

This founder's zero-emission engine concept for commercial trucking addressed a clear market need. The logistics industry faces pressure for sustainable solutions, creating opportunity for new technology.

Their background in logistics provided market understanding and identified a real problem. The engineering work appeared complete with detailed specifications and supplier relationships established.

However, network validation revealed concerns about technical feasibility. Industry experts provided examples of similar "new engine" concepts that failed to deliver promised performance in real-world conditions.

Most concerning was the disconnect between the founder's financial background and the deep mechanical engineering expertise required to execute this vision. Without domain-specific technical capability, there was no way to validate whether the solution would work as designed.

When ambitious claims can't be backed by proven capability to deliver, the risk becomes too high. And this is why I said no.

𝐌𝐲 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐤

𝐀 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐤𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧

𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐫

𝐐: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐞?

Technical assessment must be calibrated to industry complexity. In software, coding ability is increasingly commoditized – building an MVP is table stakes. The real challenge is market fit and distribution.

For physical products, especially in regulated industries like medical devices or energy, feasibility validation becomes critical. I leverage my network to get expert perspectives on technical claims and industry adoption barriers.

I also use AI tools for initial feasibility research, but industry experts consistently catch adoption issues that pure technical analysis misses. Someone might design a working product that the industry will never adopt.

The key insight: I'm betting on the founder's ability to figure it out. If their first approach doesn't work, will they have the knowledge and adaptability to pivot effectively? Domain expertise makes that pivot more likely to succeed.

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐖𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐋𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐞𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭?

𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬

Technical capability isn't universal - it's industry-specific. What qualifies as "technical" in software differs dramatically from medical devices or industrial engineering.

In complex physical products, domain expertise often matters more than general engineering ability. The founder who understands regulatory pathways, industry adoption patterns, and execution pitfalls has significant advantages over someone with superior technical skills but no domain knowledge.

Network validation becomes essential when evaluating capabilities beyond your expertise. The best founders welcome this scrutiny because they understand the technical challenges they're tackling.

The ledger entry is clear: bet on founders whose technical capabilities match the complexity of their chosen battleground.

Auditing more talent next week,
Will Stringer

𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤

P.S. If you found value in this entry, add it to someone else's ledger by forwarding this email. If you're that someone, subscribe here to get inside access to how I invest in exceptional people.